While so much as already been said and written about the health crisis linked to Zika virus, it's useful to step back, in order to put this crisis in an anthropological perspective and multifaceted that will emphasize three issues : health, poverty and gender. That's how we will consider the intersections between health and poverty, between poverty and gender and finally between gender and health, in order to take a look at the relationship of these three issues considered together and that will help us to undestand Zika, which is not only an identifier but also a disturber of gender inequalities. Relations between poverty and health are not one way only but interact with one another. Hence, the level of poverty, that is to say the social level in all its components : education, settlement, incomes, geographic location, environment and quality of life, are a key factor for health. Poor health is a direct consequence of poverty, which also create a "poverty trap" that restrains people from achieving their potential for individual and social development, and from a full involvement in global development. As well as poverty doesn't know fate, there is no link between gender that would only be a natural circumstance. The social construction of gender, commonly called gender approach, has a key role to play in the persistence or even the aggravation of poverty phenomenon. Gender relations have always and everywhere, at different levels, resulted to a limited, or even non-existent, access of women to property, to education and to loan, keeping them in a situation of financial dependency and leaving them few options, initiative and decision in financial matters or jobs for instance. By keeping women in the reproduction domain and by shutting them down from accessing to production and to economic life in the broad sense, there are as many lost potentials for the autonomy of women and girls, as there are for their development process itself. For this third issue, the one about health and gender interactions, it seems essential to me to insist on the fact that health inequalities reflects and also strengthens the biological and societal gender differences. In many cases, being a woman or a man does not allow you to express in an even manner your specific needs in terms of health care, just as well as the difference in gender does not give you the same access to this care. Being a man or a woman does not give you an even ability to decide by yourself and for yourself what is good or necessary for your health. Being a woman, in many countries, set you in a passivity and a submission role, particularly to gender violence which always have consequences in terms of health, either physical or psychological. There is an issue which strongly shows how gender and health inequalities self-sustain themselves : it is the maternal mortality and morbidity. In Africa, 75% of the 15-24 years old seropositive are women. In the world, 150 million women have unfulfilled needs in terms of birth control, leading to thousands of unwanted pregnancies. 11% of maternal mortality cases are a direct consequence of unsafe abortion. Finally, 200 million of women currently alive have suffered a sexual mutilation in at least 30 countries. The virus Zika infection has appeared in many countries, particularly in Latin America, where the impact and influence of religious values from the Catholic church, 40% of Catholics live in Latin America, but also from different evangelist movements, often even more radicals and conservatives in their teachings, are very rooted and strongly influential to the behaviour of people. The current official and/or dominant doctrines restrict or proscribe the reproductive rights of birth control or abortion, which is passed on by repressive national legal entities. Hence, in Brazil, despite the fact that access to family planning is a constitutional right, but not very efficient because of poverty and lack of information in this area, the right to abortion is extremely limited It is only legal in cases of complications that would endanger the mother's life, or in cases of rapes, or when there is an anencephalic pregnancy. In fact, a recent study showed that 1 out of 5 under 40 years old Brazilian has undergone an abortion at least once, in the majority of cases, completely illegally and in unsecured sanitary conditions, and as a result there is an increase of maternal mortality. With the exception of wealthy women who can afford a secure abortion, the overwhelming majority of women confronted to high risk abortions, happen to be coloured women, young and poor, living in the less developed areas of the country and facing repeated sexual abuse. In such conditions of poverty, of latent sexual abuse, and denial of access to medical care in terms of birth control, it appears that this health crisis cannot be solved by pathetic advices, if not criminal, given to women "to avoid pregnancy or to postpone it", these advices can be so ignoring or wanting to ignore reality that women and girls are not in a position to freely decide for themselves if, when and how they want to be pregnant. Maybe more than any other pathology the Zika virus infection acts as the revealer and the creator of social inequalities and men/women inequalities, perhaps even weather inequalities amplified by the environment degradation on the pathogen vector which is operating in developing countries in Latin America, Asia, Oceania and oriental Africa. But the pandemic, with its gender features is also useful to remind us that a global response to these public health issues, won't be able to ignore the need and urgency to make human rights effectives by the integration of products and services of sexual and birth control health, by sexual education, by maternal health, and by secure abortion inside national legal frameworks. The current health crisis must of course bring solutions in the medical field, particularly for the research of vaccine and treatment as well as in the improvement of health care system. However, it must, just as with the HIV crisis, find other solutions in the world complexity itself and with the forces that constitute it, that is to say, unequal relations between political, economical, social and gender powers which have encouraged systems of exclusion, domination and men violence at the expense of girls and women. If we cannot separate health, poverty and gender, we can see that reducing Zika to a simple health crisis without taking the other factors into account, comes down to negate girls and women their fundamental rights, and more widely negate the essential aspect of development both juridical and anthropological.